GTA VI: Analysis of the Criminal Profile System – Could Protagonists Be Really "Professionals"?

Rockstar Games wants us to play a professional criminal in GTA VI? Yeah, bye. GTA 1997 visited to remind you that LITERALMENTE we ordered the assassination of the President of the United States of America. Apart from the jokes, the reports on GTA VI's criminal profile system made me think. Would they have been able to qualify as "Professionals" some of the previous GTA protagonists if we had examined their criminal stories during their respective games? I apologize if it is long, but I wanted to conduct a complete and definitive investigation into the GTA saga and its protagonists. For those who do not know, the categories of criminal profile are: Professional Aggressive Violento Psychiatry Unfolded Beyond Wrap (my addition) The concept reminds me of the Red Dead Redemption honor system, but instead of measuring whether someone is honorable or dishonorable, we examine his criminal behavior and to what extent he is willing to push himself. Before we start, I'd like to clarify something. If we judge these characters by simply relying on their ordinary criminal activities and crimes, it would be a completely different discussion. For example, if we classified them on the basis of crimes ranging from small crimes and violations to aggression, attempted murder, armed robbery, murder and other serious crimes, the protagonists would naturally fall into different categories. Some would be "Professionals", other Aggressives or Violents, while some characters would definitely reach the Psychiatric category or perhaps Unfolded. And honestly? There wouldn't really need this investigation. However, since the GTA VI reported system introduces the idea that your criminal behavior can determine whether the game considers you Professional or someone who has gone too far, I became curious to know how this concept would apply to the protagonists who have given us over the years. That's why I did this publication. My Classification Rule For this investigation, I have established an important rule: If a character deliberately commits an act of terrorism or a large-scale comparable destruction, it is automatically disqualified by "Professional". To this end, I am not suggesting that any explosion or act of sabotage legally constitutes terrorism. I am using the term more widely for this fictitious classification, especially when a character deliberately performs a large bomb or destroys buildings, factories, significant infrastructures or other important targets through explosive attacks. The context is important. An accidental explosion, an act under direct coercion and a deliberate attack should not automatically be treated as identical. Similarly, simply participate in an armed robbery or kill someone unautomatic